Yurtyzstan has suffered a fair amount of criticism in the past for
our construction of yurts. It has been called “silly”, derided as an activity
not reflective of seriousness or adequate cultural development. I certainly do
not hold any grudges against our critics in this area; I merely hope to show
that yurt-building is in fact a deeply cultural affair.
I need not remind former members of the Organisation of Active
Micronations that Yurtyzstan has had a thoroughly immature past. (I believe it
perhaps a bit pretentious, as well as premature, to say that Yurtyzstan has now
reached a zenith of sophistication -- but certainly I hope it can be said that
we have made much cultural progress over the past year.) Without any sort of
true cultural cohesion other than clumsy North Korean simulationism, we had
only physical activities to hold the nation together. Being situated in a
forest, the next natural step was to utilise the materials available to create
standing structures.
However, as our culture has gained a much higher level of
thoughtfulness, the yurt remains ubiquitous and much-loved by the Yurtyzstani
people. We have not, to any extent, retained the mask-wearing, war-mongering
immaturity of the better part of 2011; therefore, I believe this demonstrates that
the yurt has become an integral part of our national identity. In combination
with some other elements, it provides us with originality. It serves as a
central tenet of Yurtyzstani nationalism; among all model states, few (if any)
demonstrate this level of physical development in conjunction with cultural maturity.